This organization, as did the much larger utah mormon church and many smaller divisions, developed as a direct result. Book of mormon historicity ranks ninth, and the other specific historical issues barely register at all. The most commonly eliminated have been the words that 188 times, the 48 times, it came to pass 46 times, a and and 40 times, and had 29 times. The book of mormon resembles the bible in its length and complexity and in its division into books named for individual prophets. The publication of the book of mormon was a significant event in the life of the church. It declares that it is the translation of a text from history page 29, and what we have is the text in translation. Deuteroisaiah in the book of mormon lds discussions. Although the plates were first revealed to him on september 22, 1823, smith said he was not allowed to retrieve them until september 1827. Roberts concluded, assuming a hemispheric geography theory for the book of mormon, sufficient parallels existed that future critics could claim that view of the hebrews had provided a. One group, the lamanites, forgot their beliefs, became heathens, and were the ancestors. Oct 30, 2018 the book of mormon describes itself as an abridgment of the record of the people of nephi, and also of the lamanites as well as an abridgment taken from the book of ether also, which is a record of the people of jared, which was sealed by the hand of moroni, and hid up unto the lord, to come forth in due time by way of the gentilethe interpretation thereof by the gift of god book of mormon title page. The historicity of the book of mormon religious studies. History and historicity in the book of mormon fair. Why does the book of mormon include the rise and fall of two.
Its followers hold that it is a divinely inspired work revealed to and translated by the founder of their religion, joseph smith. Understanding textual changes in the book of mormon. As we begin to explore mormon archaeology, it seems appropriate to introduce the fascinating history of thomas ferguson, an attorney by trade, whose true passion manifest as an amateur archaeologist who dedicated decades of his life to the search for evidence to validate the book of mormon as a historical record. Pretty much everything you expect to see in a religious text. Those who rely solely on scholarship reject revelation and focus on a limited number of issues. The book of mormon must be read as an ancient, not as a modern book. The book of mormon presents problems that cannot be explained away regarding the following topics. If there are problems with the book of mormon, it is not that the book s artifacts have not been found that presents the problems, but that the book s. Some problems with book of mormon historicity ryan thomas. Latterday saints accept the fact that the book of mormon is the word of god, brought to light through the prophet joseph smith. Anderson, personal writings of the book of mormon witnesses, in book of mormon authorship revisited. Ten littleknown facts about the book of mormon meridian. They multiplied and eventually split into two groups. Smith claimed the angel moroni, a prophet in the book of mormon, directed him in the 1820s to a.
The origins, authenticity, and historicity of the book of mormon have been subject to. Lds church members are taught that the book of mormon bom is scripture, as well as a true record of the inhabitants of the americas from about 2200 bc to 420 ad. It relates the history of a group of hebrews who migrated from jerusalem to america about 600 bce, led by a prophet, lehi. Fragments of the original text were found and studied by renowned historians with credentials and experience. Why is the book of mormons historical authenticity so. He established the new world archaeological foundation, where his role as. Church admits book of mormon not history the mormon church just admitted that the book of mormon is not a textbook of history and it is not a definitive work on ancient american agriculture or politics. What the book of mormon does show is its own participation in and influence from the greater trends in the lands where it occurred. Joseph smiths practice of folk magic and treasure di gging was deeply problematic joseph smiths first. Apr 20, 2003 even one prominent mormon apologist, john tvedtnes, has rejected such evidence for the book of mormon see dialogue. Over the years, a few hundred deletions have also been made, primarily to improve the book grammatically.
Much of the book of mormon is plagiarized from the bible. In its landmark 1907 address to the world, adopted by a unanimous vote of the membership and published at the height of the controversial reed smoot u. Jan, 2021 the bible problem in the book of mormon joseph smith claimed that the book of mormon is an ancient text written by ancient jews who came to the americas long before columbus. Members of the church of jesus christ of latterday saints lds church and other denominations of the latter day saint movement generally believe that the book of mormon describes ancient historical events in the americas, but historians and archaeologists do not regard it as a work of ancient american history. Nothing is known about the dna of book of mormon peoples, and even if.
Mar 31, 2019 new testament is not historically credible, culturally problematic the book of abraham was not a translation, as joseph smith claimed taught the book of mormon is not a record of ancient americans as joseph smith claimed, but instead is a 19th century work of fictionplagiarism. The imperative for a historical book of mormon the interpreter. The bible blunder in the book of mormon is jesus alive. Joseph smith claimed that the book of mormon was the most correct book. Why the message behind the book of mormon musical is so. One of the problems with the book of mormon is that the church teaches a literal interpretation of it as the book is intended to be a true history of the people in it. The church of jesus christ of latterday saints has maintained that the book contains an abridged, written history of three groups of people who left the old world and came to. It begins with lehi in jerusalem, follows his familys journey to the promised land, and the remainder of the book primarily chronicles the history of their descendants.
As weve covered in the king james bible and the book of mormon overview, this by itself is a massive problem for the book of mormons claim to authenticity, as it contradicts the narrative that joseph smith translated the book of mormon by putting his seer stone in a hat, sticking his head fully inside to block out light, and then dictating the words that appeared from the stone. These take the form of such things as double negatives, incorrect adverbs and adjectives, and incorrect tenses. It is not a record of all former inhabitants of the western. The problems of the book of mormon, salt lake city. The stories surrounding the history of the lds church that the book of. The issue of the historicity of the book of mormon highlights the difference between those who rely solely on scholarship and those who rely on revelation, faith, and scholarship. Devaluingdenouncing science history of violence council of 50. Apr 02, 2021 the term menace is the churchs own term, not ours. Most adherents to the latter day saint movement view the book as a work of inspired scripture. First, it lacks utterly historical or archaeological support, and there is an overwhelming body of empirical evidence. Yet some writers claim that while the book of mormon is true, it is not historical, meaning that the events it describes never took place and the people described in it never existed. Mormons consider the book of mormon a compilation of historical records kept by the primary ancestors of the native americans. Unresolved issues of the books historicity and the lack of supporting archaeological evidence have led some adherents to adopt the. Charles anthon to thomas winthrop coit, 3 april 1841, in church record 1 17 april 1841.
There is no evidence that horses existed on the american continent during the 25003000 year history of the book of mormon 2500 b. The most common belief of adherents is that promoted by joseph smith, who said he translated ancient golden plates inscribed by prophets. Horses did not reappear in the americas until the spaniards brought them from europe. The story of the creation of the book of mormon has been told many times, and often ridiculed. With its publication in march 1830, two sets of witnesses testified. Although typically thought of as a nephite record, the book of mormon actually describes the rise and fall of two peoples. Apologetic and critical assumptions about book of mormon. Finally, the mormon church leaders became so embarrassed about the grammar that they.
Reorganized lds history the book of mormon youtube. Critics cite numerous problems with the text that indicate it is of more modern origin such as anachronisms, dna evidence, lack of archaeological evidence. First, it utterly lacks historical or archaeological support, and there is overwhelming empirical evidence that refutes. The historicity historical authenticityof the book of mormon is an issue so. Questions about apparent problems in the book of mormon. Joseph smith and the historicity of the book of mormon. The problem is that the math just does not add up to make it remotely possible. These experts discovered the fragments to be scraps of funeral spells used to help spirits move on to the afterlife. A book of mistakes, error, and fraud by jon gary williams introduction the mormon church promotes the book of mormon as an inspired writing. An additional criticism of the historical authenticity of the book of mormon concerns linguistics. The answers are developed by looking at the book of mormon as history in the context of what has become known of mesoamerican history. Problems with the gold plates of the book of mormon. However, after a fair and candid examination of the evidence, many thousands of honest mormons have discovered that this claim simply is not true. A comprehensive list of the problems with mormonism.
The only problem with the book of mormon is that its theme is. It is a known fact that hebrews spoke hebrew, and their records were kept in hebrew. The theory that the book of mormon is an ancient american history is thus considered to fall outside academic. Roberts 18571933, a general authority of the church of jesus christ of latterday saints lds church, which examine the validity of the book of mormon as a translation of an ancient american source.
But relegating the book of mormon to inspired parable or morally uplifting allegory presents serious problems of logic. A documentary history of the book of mormon presents and examines the primary sources surrounding the origin of the foundational text of the church of jesus christ of latterday saints, the most successful new religion of modern times. Bom contains no real doctrine unique to mormonism except not baptizing infants no temple ceremony, no exaltation doctrine, polygamy, etc. The only bible that joseph smith relied on was the king james version.
This includes, of course, both branches of that science, namely, lower criticism and higher criticism. How a mormon lawyer transformed archaeology in mexicoand. Mormon archaeological argument that proves the historical accuracy of b of m the book of mormon claims to be a history of ancient peoples in habiting central america until 421 a. An anachronisms is an item or idea belonging to a period other than that in which it is referenced.
Montez, in her recent masters thesis, has written about the secret mormon meetings of 1922. The scientific legacy of a quest to prove the book of mormon. Besides its obvious plagiarisms, other serious problems plague the book of mormon. Dec 16, 2008 joseph smith said that the book of mormon was the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion and a man would get nearer to god by abiding by its precepts, than by any other book history of the church, vol. In 2 nephi 5, we have the story that a temple was built in the first 20 years in the new world. In the book of mormon, you see heroes and villains, prophets and idolaters, good and evil. Senate confirmation hearings, the church made the connection between being considered a menace to free institutions, as it was then widely viewed, and the things the church verifiably. Top 10 embarrassments of the mormon religion listverse. Many members of the latter day saint movement believe that the book of mormon is historically accurate. The website wanted to include a debate on some topic related to mormonism, and asked me to submit a first statement. Horses evolved in north america,2 but became extinct at the end of the pleistocene 34.
Such attention, however, is a doublededged sword, forcing the lds church to respond to controversial issues from its past, such as its history of. The book appears suddenly in 1830, with no prior references. Three big historical challenges to the book of mormon. The book of mormon can be true without being historical.
May 23, 2017 in her groundbreaking biography of joseph smith, no man knows my history, fawn brodiea mormon apostateexpressed bafflement that scholars of american literary history have remained persistently uninterested in the book of mormon. Jun 17, 2014 lucy mack smith, history of joseph smith by his mother salt lake city. According to the text, the nephites and the lamanites initially spoke hebrew 600 bc and might have spoken a modified semitic language until at least 400 ad, when the book of mormon ends. As for the notion that the book of mormon has already been proved by archaeology, i must say with shakespeare, lay not that flattering unction to. Today, the lds church is most prevalent in the united states, latin america, canada, europe, the. Problems with the book of mormon catholic answers catholic.
Problems with the historicity of the book of mormon. Dec 06, 2018 professor grant hardy, a specialist in history, language, and literature, says that if the primary purpose of the book of mormon were to function as a signas tangible evidence that joseph smith was a true prophet of godthat mission could have been accomplished much more concisely 5. For the book of mormon, history has not left any clear events where the book of mormon altered the discernible flow of history in either the old or the new world. When we add to this phenomenon other book of mormon problems, such as the lack of any historical, archaeological or linguistic confirmation, the large number of anachronistic terms and items referenced in the book, and its mirroring of the issues and problems of the nineteenth century protestant church, and we come to the inescapable conclusion. But they can neither prove nor disprove the authenticity of the book of mormon through their secular evidence and methods. At last, we move to perhaps the most obvious of the problems in arguing that the book of mormon can be seen as any kind of historical record. Critics dont claim its supposed to be a textbook of history, but the history it contains should be accurate. It is either of divine or human origin, and if it is of human origin that means that joseph smith concocted the book. I struggled with this issue waaaaaay back in high school in the 1970s when i.
As for the notion that the book of mormon has already been proved by archaeology, i must say with shakespeare, lay not that flattering unction to your soul. The mormon religion was officially founded in 1830 when the book of mormon was published. Those discussed here are grouped into 3 categories. In addition to speculation about how the book of mormon may possibly fit the historical contexts it purports to derive from, alternative historical.
Sep 07, 2011 since its publication, the questions surrounding the historical authenticity or historicity of the book of mormon bom have been much discussed, analyzed, and debated. By richard packham the original version of this essay was written pursuant to an invitation from the website public square, which features online debates on a wide range of topics politics, society, philosophy, religion. For example, critics of mormonism have shown convincing proof that the book of mormon is a synthesis of earlier works written by other men, of the vivid imaginings of joseph smith, and of plagiarisms from the king james bible. The book of mormon similarly has a complete lack of a textual history. Roberts authored a manuscript titled studies of the book of mormon, comparing the content of the book of mormon with view of the hebrews. Along the way, gardner also looks at the problem of anachronisms, dna, and some popular proofs of the book of mormon that need to be abandoned. In this study we will show that there have been at least 3,9 changes made in the book of mormon from the time it was first published in 1830. If this is true, then the book of mormon should be full of errors. Howe, 17 february 1834, in howe, mormonism unvailed, 270272. The historicity of the book of mormon religious studies center. When evaluating the historical accuracy of the book of mormon, one must take. Some quotes from the bible were quoted before they were even written in the bible before the biblical prophets were even born. Whether or not one believes the book of mormon to be historical in this. Oct 05, 2012 the book of abraham, one of the central texts of mormonism, is a poor translation of egyptian papyri.
The book of mormon gets the literary treatment religion. As weve covered in the king james bible and the book of mormon overview, this by itself is a massive problem for the book of mormon s claim to authenticity, as it contradicts the narrative that joseph smith translated the book of mormon by putting his seer stone in a hat, sticking his head fully inside to block out light, and then dictating the words that appeared from the stone. The book of mormon was translated and published in 1830. Huntington, page 168 of typed copy at utah state historical society non mormon writers have criticized the grammar of the book of mormon stating that god could not make the many grammatical mistakes that are found in the book of mormon. The scores of documents transcribed and annotated in this book. The problem of isaiah in the book of mormon is specifically a study in historical criticism. The book was allegedly translated from a set of metal plates, obtained by divine means, and returned to heaven shortly after the translation was completed. Joseph smiths character joseph smiths practice of folk magic and treasure digging was deeply problematic joseph. These are five problems with the book of mormon, and to doubt its authenticity as an ancient document. See richard lloyd anderson, investigating the book of mormon witnesses salt lake city. There are two possible explanations for the origin of the book of mormon.
Brodie wrote that sentence in 1945, but it could as easily have been written in 2005, when the total. The author of this paper was born into a family which belonged to the reorganized church of jesus christ of latter day saints with headquarters in independence, missouri. Jun 10, 2019 this parallel with the book of mormon, however, overlooks the fact that capital punishment by means of scourging with faggots is a practice documented among the ancient maya. In nature it is a textual problem especially adapted to the methods of textual science. Errors in grammar there are literally thousands of grammatical errors in the original edition of the book of mormon errors that gradually have been changed in later editions. There are several theories as to the origin of the book of mormon. Book of mormon difficulties, contradictions and explanations. Book of mormon, work accepted as holy scripture, in addition to the bible, in the church of jesus christ of latterday saints and other mormon churches. In the first place, the statement that the book of mormon has already been proven by archaeology is misleading. Five compelling archeological evidences for the book of mormon.
4 1204 571 46 1204 1744 611 1168 1396 1168 568 325 1425 1848 343 819 621 1329 1826 1095 1337 835 207 1552 15 430 586 1890 1845 1466 1873 1727 333 476 1379 500 1108